Showing posts with label raising the bar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label raising the bar. Show all posts
September 05, 2018
Sir, Sarah O’Connor writes: “One of the defining economic challenges for today’s policymakers is how to make service sector jobs more decent, with better pay, security training and opportunity for progression”, “Payday lender’s demise will not free workers from the labour trap” September 5.
I do not agree. Few years ago I wrote that before our policymakers invest (waste) scarce resources trying to guess were the markets are going and create jobs, we need to build the floor and create decent and worthy unemployments.
“Better pays” raises the bar, something that could even kill jobs. A Universal Basic Income, that could start at a very low and absolutely sustainable level, could help many to reach up, more decently, to whatever jobs were available.
That would allow employment to be much more “the answer to financial distress, not the cause of it.”
@PerKurowski
July 12, 2017
The right of an unemployed to find a job, even if the job is not that satisfactory, does it not count for anything?
Sir, you agree with the “Taylor report” that in order to pay Uber drivers the statutory minimum wage entitlements, these should be paid with “adjusted piece-rates such that an employee working averagely hard earns at or above the minimum wage level”, “A judicious adjustment to the gig economy” July 12.
Really? Is that an incentive for an Uber driver to work more or less than average?
What will, what must happen, is that a lot of not really interested in earning a lot drivers will be asked by some out-of-workers-to-represent unionist, to sign up to Uber by those who want to earn more, so as to get those work averages down.
If any Uber driver works, and is not satisfied with his earnings, then he can always go and work someplace else for a minimum wage.
Sir, why do you agree with artificially raising the bar for people to reach up to the gig-economy? Is it not better to instead of raising minimum wages to start thinking about implementing a universal basic income that could function as a convenient step stool to help people reach up to the gig-economy?
When are you to wake up to the fact that as much as we need to think about the rights of the employed, we must think of the rights of the unemployed to at least work somehow?
Does it really have to be all or nothing? Don’t forget that besides jobs we will also need worthy and decent full or partial unemployments.
Sir look around, have you not noticed that many of those who would not use regular taxies, are now calling up Uber drivers? Does that not mean anything? You really want us to go back to how it was?
@PerKurowski
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)