Showing posts with label Margrethe Vestager. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Margrethe Vestager. Show all posts
September 16, 2019
Sir, Ms. Rana Foroohar writes: “Whatever their size, the winning companies will be those that are profitable. That may sound obvious, but it hasn’t been for the past decade, as easy money has dulled investor senses.” “Activist’s critique of M&A is right” September 16.
But where did that “easy money” come from? Was it not central banks injecting immense amounts of money, and which effects were much distorted by the risk weighted bank capital requirements, which low capital requirements allowed that liquidity to multiply manifold? Has Ms. Foroohar tried to put the breaks on such easy money, or the contrary has she not been egging it on?
And Ms. Foroohar concludes: “Meanwhile their Big Tech competitors are already being circled by regulators… Attorneys-general from 50 US states and territories in the US have launched an antitrust investigation into Google’s dominance of search and advertising, while New York is leading a probe of Facebook’s monopoly power… in Europe, the EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager… has been given a broader remit that includes digital policy.”
Should we cheer that? Absolutely not! For two reasons:
First that it might lead to Big Tech entering into too close too dangerous relation with Big Brother.
Second we, whose personal data is being exploited by Google, Facebook and similar, should be compensated long before redistribution profiteers and neo-ambulance chasers… for instance by having 50% of their ad-revenues to help fund an unconditional universal basic income.
@PerKurowski
September 01, 2016
It would be nice, and fair, to see technocrats, like Margrethe Vestager, directly affected by what they decide.
Sir, I refer to John Gapper’s “Apple, keep your cool over global tax” September 1 in order to ask one question.
If Margrethe Vestager had her future pensions defined by the medium pension paid out in her constituency, would she do what she is doing with Apple. She might and she might not, but it sure would be nice to see her personally affected by what she decides.
I truly believe that no government bureaucrat/technocrat should receive a pension over the median pension paid in their country.
And that includes Prime Minister and Presidents and similar big shots.
@PerKurowski ©
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)