Showing posts with label backstop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label backstop. Show all posts
February 05, 2015
We citizens authorize governments to support banks among others with some backstop mechanisms, and not to mention the bailouts.
And then come the regulators and allow banks to leverage that support especially when banks invest in those safe assets in which we, risk adverse small investors, want to invest in, with are own not-leveraged funds.
And in this way the regulators make the banks compete directly with us for what little supposedly really safe is available; and also make them stay away from what should be the banks’ prime business, namely lending to the risky, like small businesses and entrepreneurs, as they are the experts in that... not we.
Sir FT, I do not understand how you cannot find that more than a bit loony.
January 21, 2015
Governments, stop holding the regulatory gun against equity strapped banks, and give the real economy a chance
Sir, Martin Wolf holds that “the Eurozone may fail, not because of irresponsible profligacy but rather because of pathological frugality”, “Bolder steps from Europe’s central bankers”, January 21.
And with “frugality” Wolf basically means governments, in this case especially Germany, not taking advantage of extraordinary low rates, “virtually free money”, to pump up their economies by means of fiscal deficits.
If Wolf and I had a project made viable by someone offering some extraordinarily generous financing terms, we would take the loans and go ahead, without the slightest remorse of us, the small fish, taking advantage of the huge market.
But when governments, in much by their own doings finds extraordinarily advantageous financial conditions on its borrowings, it should never forget that much of those advantages fall on the back of large groups of its own constituencies… who will now for years be collecting insufficient interests on their savings.
If Wolf were 30 year old, how much would he want his broker to allocate to the financing of German infrastructure at 1.1 percent for 30 years?
Currently regulators require banks to hold much more equity when lending to small business and entrepreneurs than when lending to sovereigns. That is like the governments holding the gun on equity strapped banks, telling them “give us, not them, the money!”
Why is it so hard for Wolf to understand that the whole banking system has effectively been sequestered by means of the: “You banks, I the government will support you, but only if you support me”.
Why not allow banks to finance what without the regulatory distortions would be financed, and have the governments wait until the citizens have made their pretax earnings to tax them… instead of taxing them in advance… in such a non-transparent way?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)