August 24, 2006

Letters to the editor

Do you think that all our comments to a newspaper such as Financial Times sent to letters.editor@ft.com are read right away by the editor of FT? Wrong! They go there so that a blue-collar editor can first make heads and tails out of our comment. Only then does it get forwarded to Sir.

Do you know who is a good editor? One fine day, you find yourself agreeably surprised by the fact that they have actually published your letter in FT and you say to yourself, “and this is exactly what I said, so this time I must have written it well.” I challenge you to go back to your original and find out how many changes were really made, some of them with feathers, but others with axes.

And so, talking about editors, this is an as-good-as-it-gets opportunity to thank them all.

For my letters to the Financial Times I have been able to identify two editors of my words, Heather Davidson and John Munch. If there are more of you over there, please tell me or consider yourself thanked in absentia.

For the editing of my one and (so far) only book, and of my many English-language major statements, my editor-in-friend is James T. McDonough, Jr., Ph.D., whom you can find through JTMcDJrPhD@aol.com.

Finally for all my writing in Spanish, it is my wife Mercedes who helps me out, not so much with feathers though, but I will not give you her e-mail address as she is exclusively retained by me. (Shhh! She doesn’t know it!)

And so, friends, the next time you read a posting in this blog and you don’t understand what Per Kurowski is talking about, most probably it is because his letter is still in the bottle, it never got there, or it was just hopeless.

Dear editors, once again, thanks!

Per

August 21, 2006

A global monetary fund needs foremost to go global

Sir, we agree with Peter Costello that “The global monetary fund needs to reform its quotas”, August 21, but we do not believe this is achievable by reshuffling some local interests. In order to globalize the International Monetary Fund what it really needs is to get free from many of the constraints imposed by outdated geographical considerations. In this respect the world has to find ways of providing the Fund with a representation that is more independent from borders, perhaps even giving a Chair to the Constituency of the International Rovers by which we mean all those workers, skilled or unskilled, legal or illegal, who nowadays represent jointly one of the largest economies of the world.

It is also somewhat contradictory with democracy being promoted around the globe to still hear that the voting rights in multinational organizations should be based on some dubious relative economic weights. Dubious? Yes indeed! Who says that it is the gross national product of a country that should be determinant? What about the net results (quality of life), what about the balance sheet (market capitalization), what about cross border trade, what about idea generations, what about other real power sources?

When I was an Executive Director in one of the international finance organizations, the World Bank, 2002-2004, what most worried me was how extremely underrepresented “Mother Earth” really was. It behooves us more to get a fix on that.

August 19, 2006

Long-term benefits of a hard landing

Published in FT, August 23, 2006

Sir, While you correctly argue (“Hard edge of a soft landing for housing”, August 19,) that “even if gradual, a global housing slowdown would be painful” you do not really dare to put forward the hard truth that the gradualism of it all could create the most accumulated pain.

Why not try to go for a big immediate adjustment and get it over with? Yes, a collapse would ensue and we have to help the sufferer, but the morning after perhaps we could all breathe more easily and perhaps all those who, in the current housing boom could not afford to jump on the bandwagon, would then be able to do so, and take us on a new ride, towards a new housing boom in a couple of decades.

This is what the circle of life is all about and all the recent dabbling in topics such as debt sustainability just ignores the value of pruning or even, when urgently needed, of a timely amputation.

PS. At World Bank 2003: “Burning a little each year, thereby getting rid of some of the combustible materials, was much wiser than today’s no burning at all, that only allows for the buildup of more incendiary materials, thereby guaranteeing disaster and scorched earth, when fire finally breaks out, as it does, sooner or later.”

PS. When the moment came, 2007-08, they preferred to kick the can down the road. This would have had a better chance of success if they had eliminated the distortions in the allocation of credit to the real economy that the risk weighted capital requirements for banks cause. Unfortunately they did not, and the crisis can is still out there and it will roll back on us... ever so much

PS. December 2018: “What goes up too much must come down too much. The best countercyclical policy there is, is the elimination of the procyclical ones.” 


Can the markets do more for the moviegoer?

Mr. Arthur Spilling a socially conscientious moviegoer from Rochester, NY, commented that he felt a bit bad when watching a big-budget flick knowing he was paying the same price that those poor folks who were watching a cheap run-of the mill movies and so decided to ask Dear Economist August 19 in FT-Weekend, about why do not movie theaters have adjustable pricing.

Dear Economist answered with a set of very good arguments like that it was not really a question of movies being purchased but of screening time; multiplexes not wanting to sell cheap tickets that could be used to sneaking in on more expensive ones; no one wanting to be associated with discount movies (don’t know why? I would, if the pay is right); and the rumored possibility that the whole movie industry might in fact just be fronting for a much more profitable popcorn business.

I am no one to argue against such insightful comments but, nonetheless, especially since Dear Economist never really answered why more efforts were not made to get every seat in the house full, I felt that something went amiss. So let me try to deepen the discussion with humble comments.

First, if it really was screening time that was being sold, then of course the question would be how come Mr. Spilling who probably sat there with a partial view of screen and a totally stiff neck looking up could accept to subsidize a Mr. Poor Folk who most probably was enjoying something more close to a private screening. Then also Dear Economist, as an economist, should take us though the world of elasticity of demand in order to help us understand better how moviegoers would respond to differential pricing. One big issue is of course how markets could help? Is there room for a market in futures in-a-year-from-now-screenings-on-stage-4-at-7pm and, if so, could there be some derivatives through which you could cover bad movie risks and, if so, what critics might get a hold on the movie rating monopoly?

Honestly, I think we are just scratching the surface of issues that besides Mr. Spilling, must be concerning a lot movie producers and screen time or popcorn vendors in these times of confusing entertainment patterns, when movie industries are still able to sell an expensive experience based primarily on sharing it with others, in times when iPods are threatening with extinction such rock solid sharing concepts as “our song”.

Of course a more in-depth study could occupy Dear Economists a full year ahead and since we are aware there are many other economic anxieties out there in need of guidance, a good question would be how Dear Economist allocates his column space.

August 18, 2006

How does FT know this is not a teenage prank?

“A powerful cocktail of data for predicting recession” by Simon Ward, August 17, tells you that by mixing “four key indicators of monetary indicators, both lagged and current . . . blended together appropriately” you turn into a especially good crystal ball reader. Sir, how does FT know this is not a teenage prank?

August 17, 2006

Has the fat lady really sung for the libertarians?

Sir, as someone who has understood and accepted some of the fundamentals of the libertarian arguments but just as frequently opposed the too fundamentalist solutions they offer, I cannot but reject Michael Lind’s “The unmourned end of libertarian politics” August 17. The presence of any ideas and opinions should never be evaluated in terms of if they win or not politically, but in terms of how much they can contribute to the debate.

A world without extremes would be a very grey and dull world as Mr. Lind should do well remembering as he comes out as a sort of smugly satisfied self proclaimed pyrrhic victor.

And so, to all those libertarians out there, remember that there are many of us who hear you, respect (most of) you, appreciate much of your arguments and really feel you should keep on arguing just as we will keep on arguing our dissent.

August 16, 2006

Forget the global warming fund and help instead the US to overcome its addiction.

Sir, Jagdish Bhagwati proposes that “A global warming fund could succeed where Kyoto failed”, August 16, and argues that “it is hard to imagine the US objecting to making nations pay for their total pollutions . . . [as] Such as tax is only way of creating a missing market”. Where has he been?

The US is a country that has gone berserk consuming petrol and therefore a tax to put some break on that would be a perfectly natural thing to do, and not only for environmental reasons. Nonetheless, such is the depth of its problem that even their high priest Al Gore does not even dare to mention a tax, not even as a possibility.

Since a fund, in order to function, needs that all its partners share in its objectives, and values, Mr. Bhagwati should instead join us in telling the US, as friends tell each other the truth, that it is really not worthy of sitting down to discuss global warming, until they have reduced their per capita consumption of petrol, at least 20%. Besides, if successful in helping the biggest oil addict to fight his habit one would, in environmental terms, have accomplished more than any ambitious global warming fund could ever dream of achieving, in more than a decade, or two.


WTO, please take your time!

Sir, Fred Bergsten’s “Plan B for world trade: go regional” August 16, reads a bit like a bewildered courtiers screaming out “The Kings is dead, long live the King” anxious to regain their footing and sense of order in life.

As I see it though, instead of rushing into new negotiations, desperately looking for results, any results, more could be gained from using the declared time out for some very serious house cleaning activities, destined to put some order into what is frequently described as the spaghetti bowl of trade agreements. Any global trading system, in order to be credible, needs at one point of time to be understandable and there is a feeling that there has been quite a long time since ordinary subjects, as I, have been able to understand and much less identify with what the monarchs were up to.

I have recently had the luck of being able to participate in a course about the Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) software being developed by The World Bank in collaboration with the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and that helps to provide access to the major trade and tariffs data. After that course, the real unanswered question for me was how on earth did we get anywhere without instruments like these? Or, does anyone really know where we really are as a world in terms of trade? WTO, please, take your time before you start rushing again, otherwise you might really lose us.

August 15, 2006

The through-the-eye-of-the-needle index

Sir, “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God” (Matthew 19:24), and so, as you note on August 15, the Washington-based Center for Global Development should be commended for their through-the-eye-of-the-needle index that ranks 21 rich countries on how likely their policies are to promote development. That said, unfortunately this is yet another wishy-washy instrument in that it dilutes the useful though uncomfortable specificities into less tranparent and more debatable averages and you yourself end up with an “It is astonishing that we still know so little about what sort of aid works.”

If you have a thousand movies to see but only time for ten you sure appreciate a list of which could be, even speculatively considered, the 20 best and the 20 worst so as to have an inkling of which to see and which to avoid. Well, in terms of the World Bank and other developing agencies, there is nothing that even closely resembles a best and worst program and loan list and so therefore they have little choice, as you also say, than that of embracing the latest fashions, and on which FT will also duly report. Sir, speaking in the name of all the poor in need of developing policies that really works, please help to ask for a best and worst list and then let us get some real debate.


August 14, 2006

Not much fizz but way too much oil consumption!

Stephen Roach warning that there is “Not much fizz left in the global economy”, August 14, is on the dot reminding us that what has kept the economy going lately has been the hot air provided by the foreign willingness to hold dollar assets and the US consumer spending stimulated by the boom in the housing market. He then goes through the list of support alternatives, comes back empty-handed, and declares the need for “back to basics”, which in this context must clearly mean getting some balance to the US economy. Since if the rest of world is going to help out sustaining some growth it will have to draw down on its dollar assets (do you remember recycling?) and consequently rates will go up and consequently the US must find immediate and drastic ways to curtail their various deficits, fiscal, energy, current account and the environmental responsibility in the most effective way, which of course could best be achieved by imposing a sufficiently large tax on the runaway consumption of gasoline in the US.

It is quite amazing to see how Roach can ignore the issue of the excessive oil consumption in the US, to such an extent that he even mentions that “big oil producers would also feel repercussions from a Chinese slowdown”, even though the US consumes about fifteen times more oil on a per capita basis than China. Being capable of sending away their sons to faraway places to die but not of putting some breaks on runaway consumption of oil is mind-boggling but there must be something so inconvenient about having to tax gasoline oil consumption in the US that even Al Gore finds it convenient to ignore it. Nonetheless, history will look back and shame the lack of leadership in the US for not being able to act on this issue in time, before the crisis.

August 12, 2006

Is it getting too close to home for comfort? Well do something real about it!

Sir, Christopher Caldwell in his “Utopia with border control”, August 12, lets no doubt shine through how even writers in a globalized paper find it hard to come to terms with globalization when it produces extensive migration to their own very local backyards.

Caldwell says that “after years of proclaiming a “solidarity” based on inclusion and values, the EU is beginning to practice a less utopian solidarity based on exclusion and defence” ignoring the important fact that true solidarity and inclusion needs not to be practiced only by keeping the gates to the city wide open, but could be carried out much more effectively for everyone by helping to make the conditions outside of the city much more bearable.

Another a bit unhelpful way of framing the choices is when Caldwell mentions that it is not moral guidance of Europe that citizens of poorer countries want but money and safety, as if these wishes were of any lower standing than moral guidance, and as if the European citizens themselves were in Europe primarily for moral guidance.

It should be very important at this moment for a paper such as FT to perhaps have a staff retreat where they can really talk over their role in a globalized world since it is important that some at least understand the simple fact that whenever you build a wall, it becomes thereafter quite difficult to ascertain who are the really excluded and who are the included, and that role reversals could very easily occur, most specially on a small planet where environmental problems are already breaking down all borders.

Whatever, we FT readers have the right to expect that it does not endorse the possibility of being able to get rid of a problem just by rounding it up and tossing it over a border, like we already hear some in the USA arguing in terms of their illegal immigrants.

Are children responding more cleverly?

Sir, your “Are children getting cleverer?, in the FT-Weekend of August 12, did not fully answer the question but instead left me with the feeling that us adults might be getting more stupid, as I was not able to answer correctly any of your stupidly easy question examples, though I suspected the Stoker-Dracula connection, for no particular reason at all, least intelligence.

That said, and since you felt that your international readers were not in need of any help and did not supply the answers, I did what the young are supposed to do, I googled them and came up with the answers, which felt good, but again left me with the feeling that this had little relevance to intelligence.

The report, though quite interesting, reduced itself too much to the measuring of intelligence in terms of answers to questions, when we as a society are more interested and in need of clever responses. Why on earth should we benefit from having geniuses running around if they all insist on behaving like lunatics?

Dear, it is just Tim Harford’s book!”

Sir, Tim Harford, August 12, in trying to explain why his book is priced £17.99 and not rounded to £18.00, as this does seems insulting a buyer’s intelligence, reaches deep into his bag of excuses and proves to all of us that, in this department, he is a quite resourceful young man, mumbling something of having to come up with change reduces the risk of the salesman pocketing the full 18. Now, I as a writer, who also have a book listed at 17.99, albeit payable in much more humble US dollars, would just point my finger to the merchants. In fact, when I asked for my book to be priced at 18.01, as I wanted to send a clear message that it was worth 18, and then some, my request was blithely ignored with a very hard to counter “we know more about book buyers than you”.

Giving second thoughts to this whole pricing issue, it appears to me that a 17.99 also gives the transaction a quite attractive bona-fide ring since when it appears on your credit card statement no one would ever think of it as something else than book or something similarly serious. From here on whenever I have a couple of drinks with my friends I will ask the bartender to make out the tab to 17.99 so that… “Oh Dear, that’s Tim Harfords’s book!” If they would just send me the £0.01 for the copyright to this idea I could then probably afford to give away my book, for free, though, unfortunately, few read a free copy. (Why is that? Mr. Harford?)

Thinking is being outsourced

Sir, you end up your editorial about future travel conditions on August 12 with a “computer junkies trapped in long-haul will have an unusual privilege foisted upon them: time to think. Not everyone will enjoy that, but it is scarcely a fate worse than death”. With it you quite elegantly let through your thoughts about computers being substitutes for thinking but gallantly ignore the fact that the average non computer carrying traveler might also be doing a lot less of that.

This is not meant as a defense of the computer but more as a denunciation of the generalized lack of thinking and that is spreading as a virus to such an extent that even many that presumptuously refer to themselves as think tanks are not feeling much responsible for doing it. How this sad evolution has come about takes more than a brief letter to discuss but it has to do with how responsibilities have been so haphazardly delegated. Two examples of it are how the elites of a society have delegated completely the management of it in the hands of politicians, and bankers, the credit evaluation to a couple of credit rating agencies. In other words, what has been happening is that thinking itself is being more and more outsourced, unfortunately, not necessarily to the best providers.

August 11, 2006

Let the Transparency Initiative come home

Sir, Robin Harding’s “Why business must back congestion charging”, August 11, leaves us with the feeling that we are getting somewhere, though we end up a little bit dizzy after the so many right and left turns that he takes, perhaps avoiding congestion charges. It should be clear though that the whole system is much more transparent when the congestion charges are paid in cash-tax than when they are paid in some more difficult to measure costs such as minutes of delays payable in individual currencies. That said everyone would benefit from knowing more where the cash goes. In this particular case the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative comes to my mind. Why do you not do as has been done to Chad and put all the congestion charges, petrol taxes as well, into a big transparent pipeline so that everyone knows what’s up? We know it is difficult to be a prophet in your own land but, in this particular case, since the EITI is a UK idea, you would not have to pay royalties on it either.

August 07, 2006

Drive out the risk out from where there should be none!

Sir, Andrew Hill in “A thirst for the most vital liquid asset”, August 7, serves a very good cause analyzing the finance of long term infrastructure projects through long term sources such as pension funds compared to the short term funds, and views, provided by actors such as private equity firms. But somehow, by concentrating too much on the time horizon, Hill misses the issue of risk. Given that providing long-term public services such as water should be the absolutely safest investments it is clear that society should do its utmost to benefit from attracting to it the cheapest and most risk-adverse money, widows and orphans. Problem is that currently, through leveraging-it-up-to-the-hilt and other mechanisms, they seem mostly to be attracting that risk-hungry money that can only signify more expensive water, electricity and others.

August 06, 2006

It is just an Indian Summer

Sir, over the last couple of weeks we have read about the strong growth of the US tax revenues and that has somewhat shrunken their immense anticipated fiscal deficit. But, the wording used to describe this event, which to me seems only an Indian summer before winter, has been quite surprising since reading between the lines one gets the impression that mature minds might be close to thinking that the winter is over and the spring is here. Trying to find an explanation for this utterly strange behavior I suddenly recalled that I heard an expert warning about warning the elderly too much about the risks and way bouts of frauds and embezzlement schemes, since just a few repetitions of the warnings could by themselves, creepily, but indeed also quite creepy, breed in the recipients a sense of familiarity that increased the possibilities they would fall for the scams. And so it seems that all the warnings about the impending US financial disasters could now have morphed into signs that confirms that everything is normal, as it should be, so let us then go on, as if nothing.

August 04, 2006

Basel is a monstrous factory of systemic risks.

Sir, Daniel Tarullo with his “A Simple escape route from the gridlock of Basel II”, August 4, reminds us of how the good intentions of building up a system of minimum capital requirements for the international banking system are turning into the greatest financial systemic risk factory ever seen. For instance the system favors bigger banks which will only signify placing more eggs in the same basket. It has delegated the diversified views of the market into the hands of a couple of few credit rating agencies in such an incestuous fashion that Paul Davies, FT August 3, reports that Fitch Ratings is going to launch a service predicting the likelihood of credit rating downgrades. It helps to tilt the financial markets towards doubtful areas such as the public sector finance incentives and away from the much more vital small entrepreneurs. And finally, to top it up all Basel mechanisms might just end up regulating nonexistent entities since much of the financial activities are responding by going elsewhere, to shadier places, where they are allowed to work as they best seem fit and can perhaps easier escape the Basel risks.

August 03, 2006

Just a new crop of banana republics!

Sir, Desmond Lachman in “The disturbing deterioration of developed economies”, August 3, correctly informs that the distinction between emerging market economies and developed market economies is becoming more blurred. What he missed though was to make the right, though perhaps “inconvenient”, link to global warming, since there are some of us out there in the hot that sustain that the best evidence of it, is how lately the parallels of the banana republics have been moving north!
Regards from a sweltering Washington with over 100 degrees!

You could also let out some hot air!

Sir Jacob Weisberg in “Sanctions help to sustain rogue states”, August 3, has us picking between economic sanctions and constructive engagement to topple Dictators but forgets to mention the possibility of other sensible tools such as ignoring them or plainly laughing your hearts out at them. The Dictators do normally have weak and problematic egos and so if there are ways to ridicules those in front of their followers, much of their strength and support would dwindle. Problem is that frequently the oppositions to these Dictators have weak egos too, which tempt them to make huge monsters out of their enemy, so they can be perceived as maid rescuing champions, and so we just end up with a lot of hot air balloons flying around, some quite colorful, but others just plain awful. Among the United Nation’s peacemaking arsenal we need some good ego shattering directors and producers from Hollywood and Bollywood. Where is Chaplin when we need him the most?

All cannot be that bad with Mr Blair!

Sir, there has to be something personal, otherwise for a foreigner - an outsider - it seems impossible to understand the viciousness of Rodric Braithwaite’s “Mr Blair it is time to recognise your errors and just go”, August 2, and for a start it seems to contain far too many adjectives for it to even have been published by FT. That said and sidestepping the issue of Mr Blair’s support to the Iraq war, we should never forget that there are also other things in life. At this moment when concluding reading the UK White Paper titled Eliminating World Poverty – Making Governance Work for the Poor, though I would of course debate some issues, let me as a foreigner assure you that this is indeed a document that should make any Englishman proud, and even make Mr Braithwaite recognise that with Mr Blair all is not bad, by far.


August 02, 2006

We need obnoxiousness indexes

Sir Adam Lerrick’s “Good intentions at the expense of the poor”, August 2, is full of good intentions when suggesting to NGOs to shut up but fails to be convincing as it gives little guidance to when they should not. He presents the case of Kiani Kertas pulp mill in Indonesia but, if only ordinary citizens were provided with some idea of how this specific pulp mill could classify on a scale of five, in a worldwide obnoxiousness of pulp mills index, this would help NGOs to focus better their good intentions, and perhaps even help out in getting finance for a Kiani Kertas so as to be able to request the closure of a worse pulp mill sinner. As is, the NGOs have unfortunately only the next in line project to go after and many of these just happen of course to be in poor developing countries. These obnox indexes are needed for ports, dams, power-plants and many more. By the way, obnoxiousness indexes would also allow for a more rational approach to solve the not-in-my-back-yard syndrome that affects many projects needed in developed countries.


July 31, 2006

Migrants is just what the doctor orders for an aging society

Sir, yes of course “Migrants mean money”, July 31, but they also mean so much more and do not belittle it. By being able to attract that kind of entrepreneurship, drive to move forward, restlessness, non-conformity and so much more that is embedded in the migrant spirit, aging societies are able to get that vitamin they need in order to keep up with a world that does not stop just because you might be happy where you are. Anyone that pushes away migrants or just wants to accept “adequate” migrants, with PhDs, do so at their own peril, since standing still you will just fall back.

How can we make “possibilism” more possible?

Sir, Richard Lapper, July 31, while reviewing Latin America’s Political Economy of the Possible by Javier Santiso, MIT Press, makes a very good point bringing forward how “Chile controlled its exposure to world financial markets [resulting in] a relative smooth encounter with globalization.” Controlling the short term capital flows is indeed one of the most important musts for any small nation that has to travel the oceans in a bathtub. Many countries should be adopting something similar to Chile’s flow controls but instead even Chile was prohibited from using them any more, for no very good reason at all, when this was so required by the United States as a condition to sign the US-Chile Free Trade Agreement. Sir, is there any way you can think of how to get Washington to be less extreme in their preaching on free-market faiths? This would no doubt be the best way of helping the Latin America’s economies to avoid finding so much attractive in extreme populism and allow them to go more for the rational way that Santiso calls “possibilism”.

July 28, 2006

Should they now sue their Central Banks?

Warning, believing in your Central Bank is lethal for your pension plan!

Sir, Samuel Brittan, in “Central banks need not divine bubbles”, July 28, tells us, quite blasé, almost like shrugging some dust of his shoulders, that inflation, as measured, does not measure inflation, because although wheat, consumer goods, are cared for, cattle, capital assets, are royally ignored. 

The adjectives he uses in the process are ludicrous and absurd, but concludes in “Yet that is the perceived central bank doctrine today”. We are left a little bit confounded though with what he really means with “perceived” since reading further from what Brittan has to tell us it seems that it is indeed state of the art in how central banks try to measure inflation. 

Which leaves us now with the question, what are all those poor blokes that believed the inflation figures reported by their central bankers were for real and did such stupid things as invest in government debt, instead of a house, thinking it paid enough to cover for inflation? Should they now sue their central banks and central bankers for misrepresentation? 

Whatever, it sounds like making nursery rhymes out of Enrons and Parmalats. It is not that we believe it is easy to measure inflation and in fact it might be impossible. Nor can it be easy do to a central bank's job for that matter, but it is the arrogance by which they sell us the how good they are at it that really kills us.
 
It is a sad day when think-tanks are found out not to have been thinking for many years.

July 27, 2006

Who is a threatening who?

Sir, Jim Kolbe’s warning that “Baby-boomers threaten the war on global poverty” July 27, seems a bit off the mark since, as threats come, it should be quite clear by now that global poverty is a much larger one to the baby-boomers themselves.

Kolbe is of course right when he explains about how much the competition from entitlement programs might signify for what’s-over-for-aid-and-alike, in terms of cash budget allocation, but if we are really going to be more explicit about the links between them, then he should also explain that it is much more than about money. Equally no one would object that the US needs to be much more careful with its international stature but, also, even in this case, it is not really the amount of aid-dollars paid that will break or make the day, and believing that it is only a question of hard money, is about the surest way of loosing international stature. When Kolbe says that “Nothing provides as much tangible evidence of America’s leadership as foreign aid” we, the good friends of the USA, do not know where to look.

Nonetheless, let us not despair, who knows if satisfying the high expectancies build up by the baby-boomers could not turn itself into a real growth opportunity for the many poor, far superior in effectiveness than aid itself, and all in line with frequently heard clamors such as “give us trade not aid”. Mr. Kolbe, do help in fixing your entitlement overhangs, not so much for the poor of the world, they would hardly notice it, but try doing it for your own soon to be poorer baby boomers.

Are we consuming hypocrisy in an unsustainable way?

Sir, Jacob Weisberg’s “A path between puritanism and excess”, July 27, makes a great description about some of the legal and moral issues involved with decisions such as declaring illegal gambling on the internet.

Among his observations, we find that “Further restrictions will breed even more disrespect for the law, while creating exciting new opportunities for criminals” stands out as an issue that needs to be much more seriously considered, so that society stops fertilizing the markets where evil forces thrive and that, through any available means, are always trying to go for a takeover of the world.

It is high noon to call in some good economic analysis into any legislative procedure destined to prohibit something, to ascertain there is a due analyst of the supply and demand curve for the to-be-prohibited, and of the available resources for the fight. If the demand for the “bad” in question is inelastic, meaning that the “marginal” human urge for it is very strong, and the supply elastic, meaning that better returns will immediately place more offers of “bad” on the markets, and finally, the resources scarce, meaning mostly there is not a sufficient social consensus about the need for the fight, well then we are all better off forgetting it.

As a society we should never forget that hypocrisy, as a last ditch resource, has its limits too, and we should be careful not to consume it in an unsustainable way.

July 24, 2006

Yes anything could indeed happen!

Sir, Andy Webb-Vidal’s report “Bush told to plan for Chávez oil shock”, July 24, ignores the fact that oil prices are highly contagious and transmittable through world markets and in this respect it is absolutely impossible for Venezuela to launch an oil boycott that would only target the United States. The only real beneficiaries of a boycott of this sort are as always the well informed intermediaries and the shipping industry that will be asked to service longer delivery routes.

But, with respect to that anything could happen, in Venezuela, with Chavez, this could perhaps be better understood by your readers if you also had informed them that at this moment, almost eight years into Chavez’s XXI Century Socialism, gasoline is being sold in Venezuela at 3.7 cents of dollar per liter or less than 15 dollar cents per gallon.

With this marvel of a public policy Chavez, besides stimulating a runaway consumption of gasoline with all its environmental consequences, based on the international cash-opportunity cost manages to transfer a regressive subsidy of about 10 billion dollars, or about 10% of Venezuela GDP, or about 100% of the GDP of a country like Bolivia, from the poor who do not buy gasoline, to those that love to guzzle it up.

For comparison the gasoline price in an oil country like Norway that seems to been doing things right is 52 times higher and in the USA of Mr. Bush, Chavez´ sworn enemy, and the Cuba of Castro, Chavez´ best buddy, the price is only about 25 times higher. Even in the land that has inspired the term of oil-Saudism the price is seven times as high.

Now you try to draw your own conclusions of what Chavez is all about! Are you clear now?

Now so you can also understand the current opposition groups that are against Chavez, let me inform you that they do not mention this issue either. Are you clearer yet?


July 19, 2006

We need to find and fund our global National Parks

In the first of his energy & environment trilogy Martin Wolf expressed some worship of King Coal, in his second he warned us against crying wolf and panicking with respects to the global warming and so, suspecting limits to how far anyone would be willing to stretch green incorrectness, we felt he was setting us up for some conclusions that would bring him back into their arms again, with big fanfares. His “Taxation can give earth a chance, July 19, places himself squarely on the side of investing in new technologies and a carbon tax applied globally is a very good effort, that should make him presentable again, tough perhaps without the fanfares. When Wolf refuses to cross the bridge and says that each country would “keep their revenue” from the tax so to only have a “limited need for politically unpopular transfers of income across countries”, he gives up on all the efficiency gains that could be obtained by using those funds where most needed, and he complete misses out that for our earth to give us humans a chance, we need to learn to find and fund some global national parks.

July 18, 2006

Are they really sure it is enforceable?

Sir, in “Banning net gambling would serve no point”, July 18, you make some very good observations analyzing the pro and cons of this issue, though perhaps not sufficiently about the risks that are present from the needs to enforce any prohibition. Yes we read that they managed to capture some of those responsible for betting on the web, but that was the easy part, those were the ones who were looking to formalize their activity. Now comes the tough and expensive part of finding out how to handle all those operators that until now have been operating semi-informally and that after this will go into deep hiding, as will their clients, and who might very well even include some of the enforcement agents.

How long will legislators around the world be allowed to go on declaring things illegal without giving sufficient considerations to whether they have the enforcement capability and the full backing of the society’s social sanctioning mechanisms? If this is not ascertained then all what will be achieved is to take society further down on that slippery road of loosing credibility and hand over on a silver plate a new growth opportunity to those who prosper from participating in illegal and illicit activities.

Is there some state-of-the-art anti corruption tool we do not know about?

Sir, Patti Waldmeir, Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Richard Water’s report “Google campaign tests power of cash versus votes in Washington”, July 18, will have many of us from developing countries scratching our heads, for the umpteenth time, trying to understand how all that “money-talks” is not corruption when in our corrupt countries it would definitively be considered so. Of course money-talks, we all know that, but a legislator or any other government official is supposed to be above it and resist the temptations, but here you speak so brazenly open about it, without even the slightest effort of hypocrisy, so we must be missing out on something. Might there be a special state-of-the-art-legislation that permits this to happen and that we could copy since that sounds like a fresh though perhaps somewhat strange approach for getting ourselves out from the awful corruption trap we sadly confess we are in.


July 17, 2006

Why was not 6 cents on the dollar offered before the invasion?

Sir, Monday 17, Comment & Analysis gives a very complete report on the restructuring of the Iraqi debt which “by 1990, when the United Nations imposed sanctions after Iraq had invaded Kuwait, all the debt was in default” and “by the time the US-led invasion toppled the regime in April 2003 the build-up of interest owed meant the debt had grown to $140bn, making Iraq one of the world’s most indebted countries relative to the size of their economy”.

What remains a mystery though is how, under such circumstances, no one thought of making a debt purchase offer, let us say of a quite generous 6 cents on the dollar, before the US invasion, since not only is that what you would rationally expect from any normal rescuer willing to stick their neck out for a bankrupt company/country, but also, in this particular case, since it would probably have been the most effective way of transmitting the seriousness of the American threat. As is, when having to read all the front page horror stories about the Iraqi tragedy, it is hard to know whether to laugh or cry, when you describe their recent efforts “to develop a creditor profile in international markets and debt management capabilities.”

Something will indeed explode in our face

Sir, Indeed “Credit derivatives play a dangerous game” and they could and will explode in our face, at least if Murphy has his say. That said we feel that Frank Partnoy and David Steel in their article, July 17, are not sufficiently forthright in making clear that this is just another side of that same coin that was haphazardly thrown in the air when banking regulators in Basel arrogantly thought they could drive out risks from banking, but, the way they are going, risk only to drive banking out of banking.

On July 10, in FT, Jeremy grant reported on how “Regulators ‘face challenge posed by multiple ownership’” and have to work overtime trying to identify who are the owners of all those hedge funds that are taking bets on credits in order to understand their conflicts of interests and, that very same day, Giles Tett describes how “Credit officers are hot to trot in a fired-us up market for loans” and now leave the banks to work for hedge-funds.

It seems the world did not learn enough from overly centralized economies falling into pieces, as otherwise there is no way of explaining the blind support it has given to that systemic risk factory that has been set up in Basel.


July 15, 2006

Allow it, or call in the Righteousness Brigade!

Sir, Christopher Caldwell in “Online gambling can be regulated”, July 15, does not get to the real dilemma which is whether society can afford to prohibit something when doing so could mean opening up another growth opportunity for all those informal illegal and illicit activities that, if we are not careful, might one day signify more than the legal and formal economy. Before anyone is allowed to prohibit anything he should first have to present an enforcement plan that makes sense in terms of recourses and results, and that foremost has the backing of his constituency. Prohibiting online gambling while allowing Vegas and when gambling itself is exposed to a minuscule fraction of that social sanction that weighs down on smokers, does not make a lot of sense.

Since even online gamblers would probably like to know who they are dealing with, and at least who deals them the cards, perhaps much more could be gained by allowing online gambling and developing some good governance principles. Alternatively, let society bear down its full weight on gamblers. Most of us who have stopped smoking have not done so because it was prohibited, in fact in many cases that might even been the reason why we started, but because there is a quite obnoxious but extremely effective social pressure against it and which, to top it up, does not cost a lot of taxpayer dollars.

July 13, 2006

What a curious argument!

Sir, Andy Webb-Vidal reports from Caracas, July 13, that “Venezuela is to halt petrol supplies to 1,900 filling stations” and quotes the spokesman for the Venezuela owned Citgo that distribute petrol (gasoline) in the USA through 13,100 brand bearing franchises as saying “We are short [of] about 130,000 barrels a day of gasoline that’s required to meet our customer obligations and we have to purchase that on the open market and that places us in a competitive disadvantage”.

What a curious argument that is! Anyone would have thought that buying gasoline in the open market and distributing was what that business was all about. If Citgo can’t distribute petrol profitable to these 1,900 filling stations, then it sounds like they should perhaps retire from the other 11,200 too.

July 12, 2006

Careful though with giving the illegal and the illicit markets (the IIM's) another juicy growth opportunity

Sir, I am no iPod listener since I prefer radio and when I hear music I feel that sharing it is part of the experience. That said Thomas Hazlett “Antitrust regulators must listen to reason on iPods”, July 12, caught my attention when it said “Were Apple to exploit its users, its market would be ripe for an upstart”. I have some difficulties in understanding in this context the meaning of the word exploitation since if it is getting more out of the consumer by offering them something very attractive and leveraging that on his lack of choices then I would say that the consumer has most probably already been exploited by iPod, for quite a while.

Now, if I read Hazlett right, he seems to suggest that it is better to allow some time for competition to provide the market with the alternatives before calling in the trustbusters. He is probably right, I agree, though I would also have to warn against waiting for too long, since it is always preferably to legally bust a trust (if there is one) than to allow for yet another new growth opportunity for the illegal and illicit forces of evil to start pirating and copying the iPods. By the way, are there already some fake cheap iPods out there? Hey, just asking!

About the calm and silent Mr Wolf

Sir, walking in the smog of Mexico City, flying over the Amazon jungle and seeing it being deforested in order to grow soybeans for China, and soon perhaps even ethanol for the US, and seeing how the most powerful country in the world still structures its American way of life around the car, is more than enough to know that something is wrong and that something needs to be done. It is then utterly confusing to read Mr Wolf’s “Do we need to cry now that the climate wolf is at the door?”, July 12, that poses such questions as “is the warming itself a bad thing?” and “is there any chance that we will, in practice, find a workable way of dealing with it?” since with these type of doubts he could run the risk of justifying inaction, but perhaps Mr. Wolf suffers from a special phobia against “crying wolf”. Of course, we should be very careful with panicking, and with all those salesmen out there offering lousy escape doors and not really wolf-proof doors, but that does not mean that with respect to the world’s environment, it is not high time to scream out wolf!, at the top of our lungs.

About priorities and painting firehouses

Sir, Edwin Truman in “Time is running out to rebuild the Fund, Mr Paulson”, July 12, screams out for putting the IMF fire-brigade in order so that it will be better prepared to confront whatever disasters might come out of the global “massive distortions” of which some of these, for instance the doubling of foreign exchange reserves over the last five years, he suggests has somewhat occurred as a response to a “weakened Fund” Wow! Yes, a good functioning Fund is an absolute must for the World, it needs new equipment, it needs new young forces and it probably needs a totally new mindset, and so let us make it really sure that we are not just rearranging the drawer or painting the firehouse, just to calm our nerves.

I for one have for a long time sustained that the way the Fund has given in to their bank regulator chums in Basel, forcing the substitution of some few credit rating agencies for the diversified views of a free market, has just been one of the most incredible build up of systemic risks the world has ever seen and so, to me, enhancing the Fund’s legitimacy, post Argentina, needs a lot more “than redistributing voting shares and executive board chairs” based on whatever concocted ratio someone might deem appropriate. The reshuffling of pure local interests will not lead us anywhere in a global world. Where I do agree completely with Mr. Truman is in his call against the “irresponsible fiscal position” of the US and that on remedying this is where the new Secretary “needs to exert leadership at home to achieve results abroad”, perhaps even to such an extent that he should instead ask Mr Paulson to forget about the Fund for now, do not even go to Singapore!, less it becomes an excuse for him painting his firehouse too.

July 11, 2006

Hedging our emotional investments in World Cups

Sir, Dave Shellock, July 11, reports that Italy’s victory in the World Cup final gave a boost to the shares of Juventus, the Turin club that aligned several players in the team that beat France. A bit late though since had we only known about it earlier, many of us could have used this possibility to hedge our emotional investments in our respective favorite teams. Let us not worry though, by next World Cup, the market should have created some derivatives against the risks of defeat.

World Cup

On pushing the merchandise!

Sir, Stephany Griffith-Jones and Robert Shiller in “A bond that insures against instability”, July 11, discuss the possible role of bonds that are linked to the growth of a country’s gross domestic product and, yes, the service of a debt linked to results should be easier than one that is not. That said and as this proposal is clearly aligned with all the current discussions on debt sustainability that are so in vogue we need again to warn that by focusing primarily on how much debt can be served you risk relegating to a remote second place, the far more important issue of what all the contracting of that debt should achieve.

In this respect and since the authors mention the positive experience with Argentine GDP-Warrants, which ironically is only the results of the Argentina economy bouncing back after the crisis, they should also have tried to answer what would have happened if all of Argentina’s debt had been contracted their way. As I see it Argentina would just have been able to contract more debt, and the fall would have been even more severe, some few months later.

There are a couple of truths in life you cannot just structure yourself out of and to try so, could only make things much worse. With respect to developing countries and their public debt, it is high time to leave this “how-much-can-we-load-them-with-before-they-break” thinking and go back to basics, perhaps to the financial “innovation” of contracting debt that repays itself!

July 10, 2006

Mr. Paulson Drop the Big Tax Bomb Now!

Sir, your must-do list for Mr. Paulson as a new US Treasury, Comment & Analysis, July 10, is very long but nonetheless you sort of forgot the “whatever-you-do-just-remember-your-wedding-anniversary” item in it.

The only thing really worthy for sticking out a reputable neck such as Mr. Paulson’s at a time like this, would be to promote a substantial new tax on gasoline consumption in the USA, thereby killing many sick birds with one single shot, and bringing much rewards for the neck-owner, the nation and the world at large.

For instance when so many remind Paulson about the need for Social Security reform they should not forget that whatever he does there will come to naught if the USA does not solve its most fundamental structural weakness, its excessive consumption of oil. Now reduce oil consumption and you need to do much less about Social Security, financial crisis, fiscal deficits, trade-deficits, oil dependency and, the top of the heap, Gore’s environmental sermon.

Let us hope Mr. Paulson does not go for a pellet gun and starts to dilute all his personal goodwill capital handing out one little aspirin here, and another one there. Let us hope he has already spoken with his perhaps willing but until now completely ineffective oil-addiction-fighting boss, about the need to Drop the Big Tax Bomb Now!

July 05, 2006

Wolf’s viva la vida loca

Sir, Martin Wolf is absolutely right in that “Coal and open markets are the best hope for energy security”, if of course he means our own generation’s energy securities, though I must say that I had come to believe, perhaps mistakenly, that part of the civilization process, of which Mr. Wolf with his column is presumably one of its anointed spokesmen, was to work on trying to make a better world for the next generations.

Now, if it is just about how much our generation can rip off the planet abandoning itself with gusto in the hands of the markets to feed their gluttony of oil and coal, then I do not really see why Mr. Wolf would exclude seizing energy resources from other countries with power, as it “would create serious global insecurity and even war” since, at least in moral terms, we are already effectively at war securing by brute force resources from our descendants.

Nonetheless as Mr. Wolf made it absolutely clear that he left the whole global warming issue pending for the next week, I guess the world will just have to wait and see. Meanwhile his voice sent a comforting message to all our political viva-la-vida-loca promoters. It said “Boys, we still have time, so take it easy and whatever you do, do not rock the boat, “the future lies. . . with old king coal”!”

For how long does the fact that we should all have started action along time ago provide us with a valid excuse for delaying it just a little bit more?

July 03, 2006

Why do you then support secrecy Mr. Carter?

Former president Jimmy Carter lectures us today in the Washington Post with a “We Need Fewer Secrets” where he solemnly advises us that “access to information advances citizens' trust in their government, allowing people to understand policy decisions and monitor their implementation.” Well as this is something that most citizens would full heartedly subscribe we need to ask Mr. Carter what he was then up to when in Venezuela his Carter Foundation gave support to an election where the opposition was not allowed to scrutinize what they felt was a very murky list of eligible voters, or access to the vote counting carried out by programmable electronic in a quite non-transparent way. Carter ends up declaring “We cannot take freedom of information for granted. Our democracy depends on it.” Mr. Carter, as a Venezuelan, might I humbly advance the possibility that so does our.

Yes, But, Yes!

Sir, Christopher Earl’s and Harvey Bale’s “A market remedy that can bring vaccines to the poor”, July 3, is very hope-lifting as they describe how Advance Market Commitment funds could give incentives for the research of medicines mostly needed by the very poor. That is of course until we get to the “once the fund was exhausted, the company or companies supplying the vaccine would have to lower its price to ensure market’s sustainability, but a reasonable return on investment would already have been achieved”, and which crudely brings us back to reality check one. Nowadays when we even hear about how the patented rights of fully amortized medicines are purchased in order to raise the prices to consumers, we need to better understand whether the concept of a “reasonable return” can indeed be mentioned in the context of creating the right incentives for research. That said, of course this is a good idea to be explored, and why not to the extent of forcing perhaps a small percentage of all the medicine costs in the developed countries to feed into these funds. The way the world is getting more and more contagious who knows if medicine developed through these systems for the poor will also benefit the rich tomorrow.

Let the willing consumer in on the carbon trading principle!

Sir, James Macintosh in “The car industry needs carbon trading”, July 3, puts the full responsibility for carbon-trading on the car manufacturers and also mentions the problem that “automotive carbon trading might not provide politicians with the image boos they get from driving a hybrid car or filling up a car with ethanol from Iowa’s cornfields”. Well, he misses the most important part of the story. As the environmental conscientious consumers are the ones actually purchasing the hybrids and the ethanol, the most important thing to be done is to make them aware that there are more efficient ways for them to help out. Let them get their real image boost by placing a sticker on their window shield stating that though they drive normal cars, with normal fuel, they are contributing all of their cash savings from not using hybrids or ethanol, to smart and cost-efficient environmental projects, like for instance a reforestation of a couple of acres in Tanzania, and that they could perhaps even watch growing on the web.

June 30, 2006

What is most at risk is Doha’s own relevance

Sir, June 30 you quite emphatically, almost desperately, pleading, ask for any results, whatever, from the current round of negotiations of the Doha Trade. Just so you are better prepared for the case of a let-down please remember that the world will still be going round and around, in an ever more inter-related way, even if all the Doha’s set their mind against it.

Just an example, look at call centers and similar outsourcings and ask yourself what on earth did Doha, or Gats, or what have you, have to do with them. In fact the most fundamental driver for the guys of Doha to produce some concrete results might be that if they do not, they will be further left behind, and risk looking foolishly irrelevant, like all those in the USA that are currently debating immigration reforms will do, when they finally wake up to the reality that they are already living in a de-facto Commonwealth with Central America.

June 29, 2006

FIFA is too Clubalised

Sir, David Owen reports, June 29, about “Fifa fund to compensate clubs for injuries” of the players, during a World Cup, among nations, and it sure does not ring right. If a player cannot play for his country because of other commitments, so be it, but to have to insure him to compensate his club or agent sounds like Fifa is turning globalisation into clubalisation. They are even arguing excuses for why they will not cover all of the losses of the clubs. If Fifa wants to go down this route, why do they just not forget about the countries and arrange the next world cup exclusively among the clubs they find most fit.

June 28, 2006

Energetic inflation possibilities

Sir, On June 28, Martin Wolfs ends his “Why the energy revolution will continue to power ahead” with an “anybody who thinks it will be easy to reduce energy consumption is simply dreaming”. He is wrong, as an economist he should know that it is a question of prices. Next to his there is an article by Francesco Giavazzi and Charles Wyplosz titled “When facts change so should central bank intentions” that verses on the oxymoronish issue of the transparency of central banks and comes in quite handy as a reminder that changed facts are most often not too transparently discussed.

As Wolf reminds us about, the average US consumer uses ten times more primary energy than an average Chinese, which set against a large economic growth rate in China and a limited increase in energy supplies should put extraordinary pressure on energy prices, as simple as that! In these circumstances, the US Fed, and the American leaders at large, should be speaking out to their fellow citizens telling them that if they do not reign in their consumption of oil, inflation will take off, they will have to raise interest rates, and then they will have to see jobs and property values all go, as simple as that! But Wolf might still be right, since expecting a central banker to acknowledge that other forces are more powerful than his and his buddies, or a leader to lead and not follow polls, well that could really be dreaming.


So many servants and not even one maid or one butler!

Sir, Martin Wolf in his “Why the energy revolution will continue to power ahead”, June 28, makes a little side tour quoting the Danish scholar Bjorn Lomborg from the Copenhagen Consensus on “if we think for a moment of the energy we use in terms of ‛servants’, each with the same work power as a human being, each person in western Europe has access to 150 servants (and) in the US about 300”. On that Wolf comments, sort of smugly, that the energy revolution has brought about the (almost complete) disappearance of both slavery and serfdom . . . ended servitude and liberated woman from daily household drudgery.”

Well, Mr. Wolf’s home might be very well staffed, but to state that man or woman has been liberated from daily household drudgery is that sort of daring statement when most of us given a choice would gladly exchange at least 10 of those cold energetic Lomborg servants for a warm human body to help us out.

We agree fully with Mr. Wolf that slavery and serfdom is horrible, but let us not forget that serving other people is something very honorable and, if we forget that, we will soon risk be all out of jobs and twiddling our thumbs, when the machines with their Lomborg servants will be doing all the manufacture and the agriculture for us. So many countries with income per capita income over 40.000 US$ per year, and most of the households cannot afford a maid or a butler! Comes to show how this energy revolution Wolf talks about could instead be running out of steam.


Sack some in the IEA!

Sir, Martin Wolf in his “Why the energy revolution will continue to power ahead”, June 28, concludes “anybody who thinks it will be easy to reduce global energy consumption is simply dreaming” and asks “where might all this energy come from?”, and he promises to tackle this monumental upcoming crash of trains in future columns. Nonetheless, though thankful for Mr. Wolf’s efforts, we should remember that is exactly why the OECD countries set up the International Energy Agency (IEA), that intergovernmental body that describes its mission on the Web as “advancing security of energy supply, economic growth and environmental sustainability through energy policy co-operation”.

Since we so recently could read in the world press about oil heading down towards $5 and the end of the oil age, and never heard an IEA representative forcefully negating such predictions, may I advance the idea that the first thing to be done, specially in times when we preach the worth of accountability, is to publicly sack some IEA bureaucrats, as incompetent lazybones, or worse, for misrepresenting the facts. This is no joking matter as hundreds of millions of persons around the globe will suffer if IEA, and others like them, do not get their act together.

June 26, 2006

The future very last book about Harry Potter

Sir, As the books about Harry Potter have meant so much for the upcoming generation and sometimes they even represent the only books it has read, there can be no doubt that the last Potter installment can actually seal this world’s fate for a long time to come. J. K. Rowlings, or Jo as we are instructed to call her in her Web page, is someone to watch, very closely. Not that I distrust her, but we should perhaps think about censoring her (discreetly). What will be the lessons she will imprint on her young and not so young and even quite old (like me) readers’ minds with her final book? What if she goes haywire? I guess I’ll manage it, I hope, but will the young ones?


June 23, 2006

The rumors of advertising’s death might be slightly exaggerated

Sir, Maurice Saatchi, in his “The strange death of modern advertising”, June 22, points out that his sector is being reduced to help his clients built their “one-word equity” (oops 3 words), as finding them and salvaging for them their one and only descriptive word is what it is all about.

But perhaps there should be no reason for him to despair since in Encyclopedia Americana we find that “The vocabulary has grown from the 50,000 to 60,000 words in Old English to the tremendous number of entries -- 650,000 to 750,000 -- in an unabridged dictionary of today" and so, not only are there many more words out there, but there might even be a niche for Saatchi in creating some new words.

That said and never taking a recommendation lightly, much less when it comes from such a reputable source, I immediately proceeded to try to register a “likable.com”, since likable sounds a very likable word, and niche, and you have to get them before its too late and you have to settle for something inferior. Unfortunately for me “likable.com” was already taken and so now I am just left with the urge for a word. See how clients grow on trees Mr Saatchi?

June 22, 2006

What? Is it not criminal today?

FT reported on June 21 “that William Parrett, global chief executive of Deloitte (one of the big four), has called for lying to auditors to be made a criminal offence worldwide, a move he believes could help deter fraud and false accounting” and I guess many readers shared my instinctive reaction of What? Is it not criminal today? Well, then no wonder!

I believe many of us would appreciate it if FT provided us a brief, in layman terms, legal explanation of where we are now, and where Mr Parrett wants us to go.

June 21, 2006

A not too transparent recommendation from Mr Wolf

Sir, Mr Wolf in desperation of achieving some positive results from the “Ten days that could shake the World Trade Organisation”, June 21, is willing to put it all in jeopardy by asking world leaders to give their negotiators carte blanche since “they can do so confident that it will not haunt them: the results would only be implemented long after they leave office; and implementation of even the most controversial deals has often passed unnoticed”.

This is exactly the type of non-transparency that would make it impossible for WTO to live up in the long run to its global institutional purposes, and it reminds me so much of some privatizations I witnessed, when the order of the day was to postpone any major increases in tariffs a couple years, so that consumers would not be able to connect the dots.

It is also wrong of Wolf to hype the demands for results of the upcoming negotiations too much and even mentioning “potentially devastating consequences of failure”, as this could spill over into those disappointments that feed the self-realization of prophecies. Instead, we need to put forward the argument that independently of the results, WTO has a vital role to play since the world cannot afford to lose “a highly successful dispute settlement system” and it also needs a world-class coordinator to give support to whatever other negotiations, multilateral regional or bilateral, that could help the world to keep moving forward in the vital issues of trade.

It is strange that although Wolf tells us “Personally, I believe these rounds no longer make sense”, he should still feel the need of ordering us to bet our last clean shirt on them.

The public sector keeps some de-facto public debt off its balance sheet.

Sir When a country provides its citizens with public services directly and does not have the resources for the required investments, then it contracts public debt, registers it as such, and collects tariffs and taxes from the citizens to service it. But, when instead a government decides, for whatever reason, to have the private sector perform that public service on its behalf, as for instance supplying electricity, then no public debt is recorded, notwithstanding that their citizens still have to pay for it and which all results in governments being able to keep society’s long term obligation with its private public service provider off the books. Yes, someone could argue that it is not really a public debt as no one is really forced to use electricity but, come on!, that argument assume that all the society could stop using electricity. As is, every time an Argentinean turns on a light at home, he is unknowingly helping to service a public debt that though never formally accounted as such, is a very real de-facto public debt and, in his particular case, mostly a foreign one.

One of the things we should expect from any good accounting is that it allows us to make valid comparisons, in the case of the private sector between companies and, in the case of the public sector, between countries, but, in this case, how do you compare France and the UK?.

Another problem with not recording the true societal debts and therefore the true societal costs is that the government starts to loose track of its real weighted average cost of funds, something we are taught to quite handy when having to select what projects to carry out.

Today instead of investing so much effort looking for the exact worldwide convergence of the accounting standards for the private sector, we citizens might do much better looking for some better approximates for our public sectors.

June 20, 2006

Mama Mia what a mountain of debt!

Sir, Zachary Karabell and Dan Chung in their “Alive and well under a mountain of debt”, June 20, look to provide comfort to the holder’s of the American’s Consumers Debt portfolio, and they are not doing such a god job.

First they draw our attention to some figures that even though they themselves do not seem too very upset about them (American stiff upper lips?), makes it hard for an ordinary reader to refrain from letting out a Mama Mia! Against a total market value of assets of $52,000bn, which includes the value of homes, they tell us American consumers owe $11,500bn. This whooping amount is not invested in a very well diversified portfolio either, as most of the income of the debtors and the value of the assets given in guarantee depend on the state of the US economy, which, to add salt to injury, is quite a prolific public debtor itself.

To top it up, the authors find their main ray of light in that “the world is awash with labor which combined with favorable demographics in the developing world, means that inflation should trend lower and rates more likely to be 2 per cent than 6 per cent the coming years” which only implies that they expect foreigners to keep on working hard in order to reinvest their surpluses in this portfolio at bargain rates. If so, they need to be reminded that this does not repay the American consumer’s debt, this does just postpone the day of reckoning.

Finally the authors refer twice to Poor Richard, which is also quite surprising given the topic as all we can remember he said in reference to debt is that “Industry pays debts, while despair increases them.”



Al Gore’s crusade against global warning is not yet warm enough!

Sir, Al Gore’s crusade for a better environment has now an official web site http://www.climatecrisis.net/. The site includes a long list of recommendations on how citizens could help, where we find all the standards like driving less and recycling more but also requests to shift up gears and go for planting a tree and refraining from eating meat, since cows are one of the greatest methane emitters.

Unfortunately in the list we cannot find a “write to your Congressmen and ask for a tax on gas (petrol)", which by cutting that demand that consumes one of every seven barrels of oil in the world just on American roads and highways, would be the best and most concrete evidence of really wanting to help out the environment… and also the American economy at large.

As a result we have to conclude that Gore’s crusade has not yet warmed up enough.

June 19, 2006

With or without strawberries the basket might still not matter

Sir Wolfgang Munchau in “Why they take the strawberries out of the basket”, June 19, states that “the purpose of monetary policy . . . is to maintain the purchasing power of fiat money” and of course we all know he is wrong, since it is much more than that.

But when he then enters his very interesting discussion on core and headline inflation, developed to take care on timing differences and avoid knee jerk reactions, either for technical or political reasons (perhaps just another difference in timing) he also seems to ignore that the basket is just a bureaucratic product, designed to follow the cost of living for an average consumer, and as such, it might still, with or without strawberries, not be able to assure us that the fiat money is not loosing its purchase power.

When one observes how in a land with a per capita income of 42.000 US dollar per year so relative few can afford having a maid, much less a local maid, we might have the right of viewing with some more suspicion the real purchasing power of current fiat money.

Sent to FT, June 19, 2006

June 17, 2006

Does it smell a bit rotten in the Republic?

Having to read in FT, June 17, two full pagers about the electoral possibilities for the wife of a former president to become president of the United States of America, while the country is ruled by the son of another former president, should perhaps make Americans question the current state of their Republic.

Sent to FT, June 17, 2006

June 16, 2006

The ugly wart ignored

Sent to the Guardian UK, May 15, 2006, destiny unknown

The left is frequently looking to reassess its relation with Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, in an effort something similar to when the right looks to reassess their relations with George W Bush.

Surprisingly enough, in most of their analysis, we see that in Chavez's case they always ignore the most concrete and convincing piece of evidence of why they should cut all relations with this dubious military ex coup-man, who quite unauthorized is taking cover behind their ideological mantle.

Currently in Venezuela, after soon eight years of a “socialist” government, petrol is sold at less than 4 cents of dollar per liter, compared to the 160 cents per liter paid, with taxes, by consumers in Europe, 40 times more, 4.000% more. By selling the petrol at 4 cents instead for the 64 cents he could get for it for anywhere exclusive of taxes, the “Socialist” Chávez transfers effectively 60 cents of dollar per liter to those “with cars” from the resources that could directly been used in favor of those “without cars” and, to make it worse, creates simultaneously horrendous incentives against the environment.

The previous is such an absolute aberration of public policies for most people, especially in Europe, especially for the left, so it is so hard to understand how they can ignore it. Perhaps it is because sometimes a wart it is so ugly that you just have to look away… but please, do not!

June 13, 2006

Little guys will still be little guys

Sir, Moisés Naim’s well written piece …the little guy is calling the shots, June 13, reads a bit like a nostalgic reminiscence of a time when the air was cleaner and power was power but, rest assure, little has changed and the little guy will remain the little guy. Yes, faster and more importantly cheaper communications do augment the possibility for local upstarts of becoming a nuisance but the real chances of the David’s beating the Goliath are about as slim as ever.

That said what really seems to be calling the shots now, both for big and small guys alike, are just plain old time fundamentals, like the environment and the availability of energy. Naím begins his article with the example of big Shell giving in to a small Bolivia but he knows very well that in a world of 5 dollars per barrel, as actually some major pundits spoke about as late as 1999, nobody would give a jota for a small southern-hemisphere hillbilly who happened to strike it rich and who probably would misspend his fortune soon anyhow. Had only the Big one act responsible and checked his runaway consumption of oil, then Bolivia would sadly still be forgotten and perhaps Baghdad a non issue.

Finally, and since Naím pits the Vatican against Pentecostal Christians, we should not forget that in this particular case, they in fact both work for the same supreme power.

Sent to FT, June 13, 2006

June 10, 2006

The global work-force needs some global representation too

Sir, The head of IBM, Sam Palmisano in his (local) Multinationals have been superseded, June 12, makes a passionate defense of the “globally integrated enterprise” in order to diminish the dangers of that neo-protectionism that is dangerously lurking around and that could create havoc for the world economy. But all of his arguments also remind us that currently, absent of any true independent representation of Mother Earth’s long term interests the World Bank seems more a “Pieces of the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund an association of very local central bankers. In this respect, in the frequent discussions about the need for updating the different voting rights and the Executive Boards of these institutions to current economic realities, what could be most beneficial is to find ways giving representation and voice to the real new kids in town, meaning all those workers, skilled or unskilled, legal or illegal, who nowadays represent jointly one of the largest and most vibrant economies of the world.

Sent to FT on June 10, 2006

June 09, 2006

An Ättestupa for Mr Lind

Sir, Mr Michael Lind in his “A labour shortage can be a blessing, not a curse”, June 9, sees himself in old age pampered on a chaplinesque modern times assembly line, and happily concludes that technology will take care of the current demographic imbalances. 

Of course, his vision, where it would seem that all the remaining young concentrates on helping the elderly, ignores that a country besides that very laudable activity, also has to think of a present and a future, and generate that kind of economic growth that will help it among other to educate their new young, defend themselves and service their debt. 

If going down the Michael Lind route then the applied technology will more probably be in line with going down an “ättestupa”, meaning those high and steep cliffs supposedly used by the Nordic elderly a long time ago to throw themselves from when their time to serve society had passed. By the way, when discussing immigration with those who vigorously oppose, it is amazing how a “well if you want to take care of repaying you public debts on your own so be it” dilutes much of the certainty in their eyes. 

Sent June 9, 2006 

Note: For this letter I based myself on myself as in my Voice and Noise you can read

The practical solutions available for solving the shortage of caretakers in developed countries are the following four:
 
1. Increase their productivity, but unless you wish to run the risk of being dehumanized on a Charlie Chaplin Modern Times assembly line cared for by robots… there might be a limit to how much this can help. 

2. Move the careneeders to another place (if there are caretakers available anywhere else), and this you should do as early as possible if at an older age you do not appreciate finding yourself in strange surroundings as much as you did when younger. 

3. Import caretakers, and this you should do as early as possible if when older you do not appreciate finding yourself in the company of strangers as much as you did when younger. 

4. Give incentives for having more children and grandchildren—which is not such a crazy idea when you start considering how much society is, one way or another, currently rewarding people for not having children. (Talk about externalities!)

June 08, 2006

Just a reshuffle among the “locals” in the Fund won’t do it

Sir, you and others seem to opine, June 8, something like if only the composition at the board of the International Monetary Fund better reflected economic size then for instance, like magic, China would speedily devaluate and all the current global imbalances disappear. It might not be as easy as that and by the way why would GDP and share of market trade more important than market capitalizations for assigning votes at the IMF and also, if we at it, why should we not go for a full democratic reform and use populations as the basis?

Much of the problem in these days of globalization lies in that it is mostly the “local” perspectives that are represented, making in fact the globe at large the most underrepresented constituency. In this respect, instead of just reshuffling the deck of card among the locals, more could perhaps be gained if some of the current chairs at the IMF Board were to be occupied by independent Executive Directors, who are there to think and represent exclusively the global perspective and interests, with the horizon of our grandchildren.


That the Fund’s professional staff could somehow act in the name of the world, well that is nice, and we all hope they do, but “Mother Earth” could still benefit from some additional support at the board level, and besides there is always the need of making sure that we don’t fall into the hand of even smaller and more parochial interests, as has indeed happened with many corporations that have de-facto been taken over by their management teams.

Sent to FT June 8, 2006

June 02, 2006

A Blog Is Born

I like reading The Financial Times, or FT as it is known, and I frequently write letters to the editor and some of them that have indeed been kindly published, for which I feel honored being mostly unknown outside of my country Venezuela.

But then I realized that all those letters to the editor that for reasons impossible for me to comprehend were never published, were condemned to an eternal silence not of their own fault, and so I decided to, at a marginal cost of zero, to resurrect them and keep them alive, right here.

English is not my mother language so bear with me and you’ll probably note when my letter has been published in FT by its correctness. Swedish is my mother language but I have not written anything serious in it for about 40 years and last time I tried, they just laughed their hearts out because of my outdated expressions. Polish is my father language but, unfortunately, I do not speak a word of Polish, much less write. Yes Spanish is my language, as I am from Venezuela and although I trust I write in it with great flair, I would never dream of publishing an article in Spanish without having it edited by my wife.

And so friends here is my Tea with FT blog with my old and new letters to the editor. I hope you will share them with me now and again, and then again.

Welcome, and cheers, as I believe they say over there.

Per

PS. Just so that FT does not get too cocky and believes they are my only window to the world, I will now and again publish a letter sent to the editor of another publication.