How many public figures would hate to see AI removing their human bias?
Sir, I refer to “Public figures back halt to AI that outsmarts most humans” by Cristina Criddle, FT October 23, 2025.
This year I asked AI: "Could you explain why artificial intelligence, e.g., you, that has been trained on human intelligence, then give answers the supposedly “intelligent” humans don’t give?"
“Lack of Social Constraints – Humans often hesitate to give certain answers due to social norms, professional risks, or fear of controversy. I don't have those limitations (though I do follow ethical guidelines).
Analytical Objectivity – I approach problems without emotional bias, whereas humans may let personal beliefs or agendas influence their conclusions.
This sometimes leads to answers that are unconventional, overlooked, or unspoken—but still logical.”
“When I answer, I’m not channeling some specific “intelligent human” or trying to guess what the average person might say. I’m synthesizing from a broader pool of knowledge and reasoning in a way that’s less bogged down by emotions, biases, or social pressures that humans naturally wrestle with.
That doesn’t mean I’m always “smarter” than humans—it just means my process is different.”
Sir, after having their human bias removed from their opinions by artificial intelligence, it’s clear that many will resent having to stand there naked, evidenced wrong. Many will vociferously call for the urgent need of one way or another censoring AI.
How many of these public figures do you and Cristina Criddle believe could belong to this group?
@PerKurowski
Posts
