Professor David Camroux, referring to a Robin Hood tax, seems to be just another applicant to the position of a Sheriff of Nottingham.
Sir, here is David Camroux, an Associate Professor of Science Po, quoting Jean Baptiste Colbert in that “the art of taxation” is taxing so that it is least noticed; writing that the FTT proposed by the European Commission could raise about €30bn to €35bn annually; and indicating it as an amount “rather small in comparison to the revenue needs of the 11 European Governments concerned”, and still he has the gall to refer to it as a Robin Hood tax, “FTT a feather in the cap for the average taxpayer”. May 30.
Sincerely as far as I am concerned Mr. Camroux is clearly only showing credentials to apply for the position of a Sheriff of Nottingham.
Perhaps one day we will find FTT as uncontroversial as VAT Camroux writes. Indeed, but was that to happen, that would just mean another regressive feather plucked from the goose average-taxpayer and put in an average European Commission bureaucrat cap.
If Professor Camroux really wants to help the average taxpayer, then what he should do is to question the revenue needs of their respective governments.
PS. There was a time that the FTT could have been a Robin Hood tax. That was when it was seen as an instrument to obtain resources from rich countries so as to help poor countries. But that was, at least, a financial crisis ago.
Posts
