May 01, 2013
Sir, you write that “the Fed’s monetary policy [is] much more efficient than in those economies where the transmission of central bank money-printing to real economy remains broken” “If the Fed ain’t broke, don’t fix it” May 1.
Indeed but the reason of that is that the US never adopted as fully as Europe did those Basel dictated capital requirements based on perceived risk, that so completely have clogged up the channels whereby bank lending can flow to the real economy.
And when you refer to that US Senators Sherrod Brown and David Vitter want banks to hold more capital you are ignoring that their bill contains the much more important provision of limiting [and hopefully making away altogether] with the obnoxiously dumb risk-weighting, something that is not explicitly mentioned in the Dodd-Frank law.
Sir, you mention the dangers of “zealotry”. Let me inform you that the worst example of regulatory zealotry is precisely the setting of capital requirements based on perceived risks that have already been cleared for.
Sir, as I wrote in a letter published today by the Washington Post, “Europe would also do better with a Brown-Vitter proposal”