Tea with FT

As a former Executive Director of the World Bank I know that the columnists of the Financial Times have more voice than what I ever had, and therefore they might need some checks-and-balances.


Would a child shouting out “the Emperor is naked” have his observation published in FT? Would he now need a PhD for that to happen?

For more see "A Blog is Born" at the very bottom.

Showing posts with label statistical significance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label statistical significance. Show all posts
March 28, 2019

The lack of statistical significance tests, p-value, does indeed allow much more, for “Irrefutable nonsense [to] rule”

›
Sir, Anjana Ahuja writes: “generally only studies with p-values lower than 0.05 are deemed to be of ‘statistical significance’. This magic ...
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.