As a former Executive Director of the World Bank I know that the columnists of the Financial Times have more voice than what I ever had, and therefore they might need some checks-and-balances.
Would a child shouting out “the Emperor is naked” have his observation published in FT? Would he now need a PhD for that to happen?
For more see "A Blog is Born" at the very bottom.
February 24, 2019
FT journalists. Is this really the legacy you want to leave to your children?
Not daring to ask bank regulators to explain why they've decided that what’s ex ante perceived as risky, is more dangerous ex post to our bank systems than what’s ex ante is perceived as safe